From: Edmund Storms
NRL is now attempting to duplicate this work. This program was
undertaken well before the DoE review and apparently was unknown
to the reviewers. If, as expected, they replicate the Iwamura
claims, the ball game will be over.
Ed
Hello Ed,
Best guestamate as to when
Akira Kawasaki wrote:
Jed Rothwell wroge
Fortunately Steven Krivit (of New Energy Times) has foreseen the
need and has gone ahead and posted the various (anonymous) DoE
requested reviews for our study and independent evaluation to see
how DoE reached its 'final' report.
Whoa! You mean here,
From: RC Macaulay
Subject: Words of encouragement
Although I am not a nuclear physicist I do appreciate the quest for
new technology for energy. Perhaps a bit of good news helps .
Our company had it's first successful testing of a design we have
labored many dark nights toward for 14
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 100 New British Nukes
Also, I forgot to mention, the author's plan to use nuclear
power generators to make electricity, to perform electrolysis,
to produce hydrogen, is preposterous. Methods using
Subject: Re: New Evidence in Gene Mallove's Murder?
At 12:23 am 29-09-04 -0500, you wrote:
You have to trust that the police are professionals. If the Powers
That Be would have done a professional hit on Eugene no one would
have been caught.
If Powers That Be were as competent as you seem to
Jed,
Just wanted to add my two cents here and let you know that those were some
of the best links on U.S. energy consumption I've ever seen. Thanks for
bringing them to my attention.
I tried without success to locate and download a larger version of the main
graphic showing all the myriad ways
Hi Jones,
A littler bird hopped onto my shoulder and suggested I take a closer look at
your most recent essay.
From: Jones Beene
...Friday Fractured Farside Fusion funniness ...
As always, great political satire here.
...
Density (particles/cm3) x Time (sec) = 10^16
(Deuterium-Deuterium
Hi Frank,
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Frank Z wrote:
Or maybe it's the other way around! I get soo confused when I think
about gravity vs. acceleration!
You are not wrong. Gravity produces a force. GM/rr
Force produces gravity
Gravity = (G/ccr) (dp/dt)
Why is this? Gravity travels
From: Jones Beene
One of the joys of surfing the internet is the occasional bit of humor
that derives from expecting one result and getting another one that is so,
er... thought provoking ?: http://www.zetatalk.com/hybrids/h00.htm
Hi Jones,
Stories of Grays originating from the
9 matches
Mail list logo
