Re: [Vo]:'Super atoms'

2008-07-08 Thread Zachary Jones
You're quite right; it was actually rather silly of me to not mention the ORMUS work when I posted this. I had emailed Barry Carter just before the list to see where he would weigh in on this work, though have yet to hear back from him. I hadn't thought about the use of metal in terms of c

RE: [Vo]:'Super atoms'

2008-07-08 Thread Brian Prothro
Message- From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 11:54 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:'Super atoms' In reply to Zachary Jones's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:04:01 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Thought the list would be interest

Re: [Vo]:'Super atoms'

2008-07-08 Thread Jones Beene
--- Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Zachary Jones's message: > This may explain something else - the "whitegold" story. There is probably something to this fable, other than the original pseudoscience of Hudson. Wiki has an entry on some of it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloidal_gol

Re: [Vo]:'Super atoms'

2008-07-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Zachary Jones's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:04:01 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Thought the list would be interested in this work on easily- >produceable atom clusters: > >http://www.physorg.com/news134129791.html > >They claim the principle is old news, but I hadn't heard of the >electron shel

Re: [Vo]:'Super atoms'

2008-07-08 Thread rvanspaa
In reply to Zachary Jones's message of Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:04:01 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Thought the list would be interested in this work on easily- >produceable atom clusters: > >http://www.physorg.com/news134129791.html > >They claim the principle is old news, but I hadn't heard of the >electron s

[Vo]:'Super atoms'

2008-07-07 Thread Zachary Jones
Thought the list would be interested in this work on easily- produceable atom clusters: http://www.physorg.com/news134129791.html They claim the principle is old news, but I hadn't heard of the electron shell 'conjugation' they suggest in the article. Zak