In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Fri, 07 Jul
2006 20:23:24 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>IYO? I do not know enough to have developed an opinion. SQM says the
>spin states are not fixed. There are several physicists who cannot
>accept this (like us). Read Bohm's explanation for one.
IMO they
-Original Message-
From: Robin van Spaandonk
Are you saying that the experiment proves that "The correlation of
states cannot possibly be predeterministic", or are you saying
that the spin state upon creation of the pair is not fixed (IYO)?
<><><><><>
IYO? I do not know enough to hav
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Wed, 05 Jul
2006 19:53:30 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I really meant to say that the inequalities do not exist. If JB's
>theory, the three axis spin probabilities should show that the
>deterministic case of EPR indicate red/green flashes >= 5/9; however,
>the d
-Original Message-
From: hohlrauml6d
I said:
"However, the data shows that the Bell Inequalities exist."
I really meant to say that the inequalities do not exist. If JB's
theory, the three axis spin probabilities should show that the
deterministic case of EPR indicate red/green
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Thu, 29 Jun
2006 18:20:34 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Here's my point (with many dancing angels): electron spin could move
>energy between Kansas and Oz. More if this congeals.
Not that I have really read much on entanglement, but I was under
the impression th
Gnorts, Vorts!
Let us suppose that my guess is wrong and permanent magnets are not ZPE
pumps. Of course, it is undisputed that the primary source of the PM
field is electron spin with secondary and tertiary contributions from
orbital rotation and nuclear spin. Shall we explore another
possi
6 matches
Mail list logo
