RE: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

From: Alberto De Souza Great views of the MFMP's experimental setup: https://theta360.com/s/mec8ROR65Uae7hy44vQSN991s Wow. Google street view meets the laboratory.

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

Great views of the MFMP's experimental setup: https://theta360.com/s/mec8ROR65Uae7hy44vQSN991s and https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WQW5OTG5QWENPRTg/view?usp=sharing Alberto. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Teslaalset wrote: > Yes, that may be the

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

Yes, that may be the confusion. I found that quote, its on Lenr forum by Sveinn himself. Thanks for pointing out. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016

RE: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

This appears to be misunderstanding of a post from Ólafsson in which he says that the Holmlid reaction works at 100C whereas the Rossi HT reaction requires 1200C. Ólafsson did not mean it worked at 100C without a laser, of course. It still requires a laser pulse or equivalent, and given

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

I can’t find that news on Ólafsson confirming an active reaction (UDD/UDH) using heat. Anyone with a valid link to that item? On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Ólafsson has gotten the reaction (LENR?) to work without LASER > activation...just by using

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

. > > Dave > > > -Original Message- > From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Apr 12, 2016 12:12 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Bob Hig

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

This small band of engineers and makers thinkers and analysts are doing amazing and very important work. They are a true fellowship holding on to an ideal for LOS, independent and thorough testing and open discussion and analysis, doing something for all people. This is so important in these

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

Tue, Apr 12, 2016 12:12 am Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: We are all hoping for a repeat performance of the "signal", the gamma burst output. In GS5.3, the team is much better prepar

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: We are all hoping for a repeat performance of the "signal", the gamma burst > output. In GS5.3, the team is much better prepared to monitor the > radiations. Time bases for all of the data acquistions have been

Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

Ólafsson has gotten the reaction (LENR?) to work without LASER activation...just by using heat. I remember somebody tell us about this a few days ago. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:* Bob Higgins > > > > Jones, can you elaborate on Holmlid's

RE: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

From: Bob Higgins Jones, can you elaborate on Holmlid's call for replication? He (Ólafsson) did not suggest anything specific, but it will be helpful when/if someone starts a dedicated site (or subsite addition) for experimenters to use specifically for the Holmlid effect, since there

[Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

Alan Goldwater, Bob Greenyer, Skip Reynolds, and Mark Jurich (hope I didn't miss anyone there) have begun a replication of the GS5.2 experiment, deftly named GS5.3. The experiment is in the early phases of heat treatment of the Ni powder I believe. The live video feed links can be found at: