http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fPXewq8S5w
Another candle fake.
On 2/9/07, John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, well I would give this a freaking low chance of being real, even if I
was ok with the open circuit I'd not be so fine with the fact it's
symmetrical yet develops a DC voltage.
Ok, well I would give this a freaking low chance of being real, even if I
was ok with the open circuit I'd not be so fine with the fact it's
symmetrical yet develops a DC voltage.
However if you look when the flame goes out on the lighter that is exactly
when the bulb turns on, so while the flame
Fascinating.
I realize wax is being converted into CO2 & H2O and other by-products as the
two candle flames burn.
But what are the energy conversion equations going on here? Part of me wants
to believe there might actually be some kind of OU going on, but I assume
that's really not the case here
Michel sez:
> Nice fraud, orchestrated by the big candle wax lobbies no doubt
> :) It would be more convincing if the bulb's light didn't turn on
> before the second candle, and if it's luminosity wasn't constant!!
>
> Michel
Oh dear, hoodwinked again!
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.Orin
Nice fraud, orchestrated by the big candle wax lobbies no doubt :) It would be
more convincing if the bulb's light didn't turn on before the second candle,
and if it's luminosity wasn't constant!!
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday
That's almost as hard to explain as the disappearing Subject line
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/400937/candle_power_who_needs_batteries/
6 matches
Mail list logo
