> Thomas, global temperature is the result of just two things

Correction: until our non solar heat output (=  non renewable energy 
consumption) becomes sizeable compared to the solar input, as previously 
discussed.

Michel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:05 AM
Subject: [Vo]: Re: Climate Change


> Thomas, global temperature is the result of just two things: incident solar 
> power, and ability of the planet to retain the heat. Failing to see that both 
> phenomenons are equally important amounts to wearing blinds. The more solar 
> power we get, the more we must reduce, or at least stop increasing, the 
> ability of the planet to retain the heat.
> 
> Michel
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:37 AM
> Subject: [Vo]: Climate Change
> 
> 
>> Vortexians;
>> 
>> In case you missed it, this man was just interviewed on C to C AM, 
>> http://www.nrsp.com/people-timothy-ball.html , he is a climate scientist 
>> who contends that what we are seeing is the result of a natural cycle. I 
>> have previously mentioned the book, Unstoppable Climate Change by Avery 
>> and Singer which says the same thing.
>> 
>> The story that really intrigues me is that there are big rocks flying 
>> into the sun from a direction orthogonal to the planetary ecliptic. 
>> Coincident with these hits are large sunspots on the other side of the 
>> Sun. This story was reported by James McCanney.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- 
>> http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
>>
>

Reply via email to