You do this all the time, why do you ask? lol FWIW:
I have the feeling your posts always come as new posts, when in fact it is sometimes clear from the context that they are replies. In such cases, if this is not deliberate, whatever your email software, I encourage you to use the "reply" button when you're replying to someone's post, rather than creating a new post (which unduly starts a new vortex topic every time, bad for the archive and for your colisters). Also when you want to change the subject line when replying it's a good idea to append "was: (initial subject)" to the new subject. Also when you reply please quote at least some of the post you're replying to (there must be a setting for that in your software) Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles M. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:28 PM Subject: [Vo]: nano 2LoT > <Several crossed postings> > > I want to explain that the temperature uniformaty used in > simple mathematical models of heat is not true, that > equipment that can stabilize temperatutes on a micrometer > or larger scale will have little effect on the kTB thermal > energy of the electrons in a single small electronic > component or similar thermal kinetic energy in a gas > molecule. The energy of the gas molecule has a clear > direction as if it was boiled from where it was and will > condense where it is going. The next step is to be able to > use these nanometer scale properties of heat. I believe > that a diode will rectify thermal electrical noise > (Johnson noise) and that a group of diodes in consistant > alignment parallel will aggregate the net rectified > remnent of all the diodes into useful amounts of > electrical power. > > Do people mind if I change the subject title to summerize > the immediate discussion? > > Aloha, > > Charlie >
