Re: [Vo]: Reply to Rich Murray on the Electric Field error, and Earthtech results: Abd uh-Rahman Lomax: Rich Murray 2010.03.11

2010-03-12 Thread Horace Heffner
On Mar 12, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: The kind of detector sandwich described is certainly of interest, but is more complex than what I can take on at this time. Note that, as described, the active surface of the gold would be away from the phosphor screen. Horace Heffne

Re: [Vo]: Reply to Rich Murray on the Electric Field error, and Earthtech results: Abd uh-Rahman Lomax: Rich Murray 2010.03.11

2010-03-12 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:10 AM 3/12/2010, Rich Murray wrote: 1. Perhaps Earthtech and others like Ludwik Kowalski would like to join Lomax in developing a simple, low-cost standard version of the SPAWAR co-deposition cell. Common in the history of CF is lack of exact replication of these always surprisingly complex

Re: [Vo]: Reply to Rich Murray on the Electric Field error, and Earthtech results: Abd uh-Rahman Lomax: Rich Murray 2010.03.11

2010-03-11 Thread Rich Murray
Re: [Vo]: Reply to Rich Murray on the Electric Field error, and Earthtech results: Abd uh-Rahman Lomax: Rich Murray 2010.03.11 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2010_03_01_archive.htm Thursday, March 11, 2010 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/44