On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:05 AM JonesBeene wrote:
> *From: *H LV
>
>
>
>- The type of "negative temperature" discussed in the article is not
>actually colder than absolute zero. It corresponds to something that has
>alot of energy so it cannot be called a heat sink.
>
>
>
> Maybe not
From: H LV
➢ The type of "negative temperature" discussed in the article is not actually
colder than absolute zero. It corresponds to something that has alot of energy
so it cannot be called a heat sink.
Maybe not. Firstly, any and all mass contains “a lot of energy” in one
appraisal, so tha
The type of "negative temperature" discussed in the article is not actually
colder than absolute zero. It corresponds to something that has alot of
energy so it cannot be called a heat sink. This "Negative temperature" is a
statistical consequence of "population inversion", whereby most of the
pa
H LV wrote:
Using a cup of coffee as a starting point this blogger provides a friendly
introduction to the history of the science of heat. He also leaves the reader
with an open question.
https://www.beanthinking.org/?tag=caloric
Harry
Well-named article... even though it chooses to ignore imp
Using a cup of coffee as a starting point this blogger provides a friendly
introduction to the history of the science of heat. He also leaves the
reader with an open question.
https://www.beanthinking.org/?tag=caloric
Harry
5 matches
Mail list logo