Re: [Vo]:Activated nanoparticles and LENR

2017-05-21 Thread Axil Axil
ern wrote: > The error herein is giving Rossi any credence whatsoever. > > > There is no Quark-X. It is a ployfor his trial. > > > -- > *From:* Axil Axil > *Sent:* Saturday, May 20, 2017 5:11 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* [Vo]:Activat

Re: [Vo]:Activated nanoparticles and LENR

2017-05-21 Thread Brian Ahern
The error herein is giving Rossi any credence whatsoever. There is no Quark-X. It is a ployfor his trial. From: Axil Axil Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 5:11 PM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Activated nanoparticles and LENR It might be that the LENR reaction

[Vo]:Activated nanoparticles and LENR

2017-05-20 Thread Axil Axil
It might be that the LENR reaction wants to run hot at just below 3000C. This could be why Rossi has had problems with burnouts over the years when the balance between cooling applied to the LENR reactor's structure and LENR heat production is lost. It may be that a LENR reactor that loses cooling