Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread thomas malloy
Zachary Jones wrote: On Jul 23, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 23, 2007, at 8:46 AM, thomas malloy wrote: IMHO, it's not proper to substitute the word research for speculation, which AFAIK, is what "the local vacuum dynamics" is. I'm wondering what the other Vortexians

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jul 23, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Zachary Jones wrote: I suppose I largely hold this same sense - though it does make me think of the PK/mind-machine affect documented by the PEAR lab. (Tests in which operator intention causes deviations in random systems) I think their random number gen

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread Zachary Jones
On Jul 23, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 23, 2007, at 8:46 AM, thomas malloy wrote: IMHO, it's not proper to substitute the word research for speculation, which AFAIK, is what "the local vacuum dynamics" is. I'm wondering what the other Vortexians have to say about that

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jul 23, 2007, at 8:46 AM, thomas malloy wrote: IMHO, it's not proper to substitute the word research for speculation, which AFAIK, is what "the local vacuum dynamics" is. I'm wondering what the other Vortexians have to say about that? I can neither confirm nor deny... Horace Heffner

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread Mark Goldes
Steve, You end with FWIW. I have to say, as with much of Bearden's ranting...not much! Mark OrionWorks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess it was inevitable. Tom Bearden has weighed in on the recent STEORN incident. See: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/072107.htm According to Bearden i

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread Michel Jullian
L PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 6:46 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN > OrionWorks wrote: > >> I guess it was inevitable. >> >> Tom Bearden has weighed in on the recent STEORN incident. > > Tom Bearden, weighing in, there's a great d

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread thomas malloy
OrionWorks wrote: I guess it was inevitable. Tom Bearden has weighed in on the recent STEORN incident. Tom Bearden, weighing in, there's a great double entendre. According to Bearden it would appear that the STEORN device may have suffered the fate of having been "...moved to the 'new' sit

[Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

2007-07-23 Thread OrionWorks
I guess it was inevitable. Tom Bearden has weighed in on the recent STEORN incident. See: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/072107.htm According to Bearden it would appear that the STEORN device may have suffered the fate of having been "...moved to the 'new' site with a new local vacuum d