From: Roarty, Francis X
* Yep, no one wants to believe significant levels of time dilation and
Lorentzian contraction can occur when gas loads in the interstitial space and
defects of metal lattices but it is the easiest solution to multiple anomalies.
At the most recent Bay Area
be related somehow.
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Avoiding_traffic_jam_creates_impossibly_bright_lighthouse_999.html
Stephen
> From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:53:43 +0200
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
&
without much normal 2-body high energy physics radiation—neutrons, gammas
etc.
Bob Cook
Sent from
Mail for Windows 10
From: Bob Cook
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 7:26 AM
To: Stephen Cooke;
vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
ut much normal 2-body high energy physics
> radiation—neutrons, gammas etc.
>
> Bob Cook
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Bob Cook
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 7:26 AM
> To: Stephen Cooke; vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay
:stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 1:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
Thank you very much for this link Bob.
It looks like an interesting paper.
It looks like the phenomena
2016 1:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
Thank you very much for this link Bob.
It looks like an interesting paper.
It looks like the phenomena on the surface of magnetars is a hot topic this
year.
I
adds to the idea of the large magnetic fields created locally by SPP’s
> on metal surfaces or lattice cavities.
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Stephen Cooke
> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:10 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.co
ent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:10 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
Hi Eric
You might be right and if so it will be interesting. Apart from the interesting
effects on the magnetic and electric fields I
, September 06, 2016 8:56 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
Yes, modification of decay rates is a topic of great interest to me.
This is a theoretical paper, apparently working within the current assumptions
of physics. In order for most
:18 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Co59 Beta decay rates on Magnetar surface
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Yes, modification of decay rates is a topic of great interest to me.
This is a theoretical paper, apparently working within the current assumptions
of physics. In order for most LENR observations
Yes, modification of decay rates is a topic of great interest to me.
This is a theoretical paper, apparently working within the current
assumptions of physics. In order for most LENR observations to be
explained by induced decay, I think that one or more of those assumptions
will need to be
I wonder if the following linked recent paper can be interesting to some here
especially Axil and Eric?
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-016-2830-0
It's concerning changes in beta decay rates in the presence of magnetic fields
on magnetars.
I have so far only read the abstract
12 matches
Mail list logo