Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion not discovered

2011-06-02 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jones Beene wrote:ssentially > Quetzalcoatl notwithstanding. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1392797/Unseen-1-800-years-Archaeologists-120m-tunnel-leading-funeral-chambers-deep-ancient-Mexican-city.html Both here and in Egypt they find writing in

RE: [Vo]:Cold fusion not discovered

2011-06-02 Thread Jones Beene
Doubt it ! There could be a connection, however - between ANY kind of LENR and increased solar neutrino output, and the E-Cat would be no exception - but is there any evidence from anywhere else that the same experiment performs better this year than a few years ago? (much less hundreds of times be

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion not discovered

2011-06-02 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: > From Frank: > >> http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/no-italian-scientists-have-not-discovered-cold-fusion/ > > Old news. Hey, you don't suppose that the reason AR has new found success in energy production from Ni/H is because

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion not discovered

2011-06-02 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Frank: > http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/no-italian-scientists-have-not-discovered-cold-fusion/ Old news. Check the date. The Gizmodo article was published back in January 26, 2011 - less than two weeks after the initial January 14 test was conducted. Popular Science, the on-line version

[Vo]:Cold fusion not discovered

2011-06-02 Thread fznidarsic
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/01/no-italian-scientists-have-not-discovered-cold-fusion/