On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> With GMail, it is better to reduce noise by searching unvanted people and
> keywords and mark them automatically as read.
>
I tried that, but Gmail organizes things in "conversations" that includes
read messages in the stream so you still e
Actually 'includes the words' searches also the 'subject' and 'from'
fields in GMail (this is google's product after all). Therefore there
is only one filter (the latter) required if email addresses are
included in key words.
–Jouni
On 28 November 2011 01:18, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> With GMai
With GMail, it is better to reduce noise by searching unvanted people and
keywords and mark them automatically as read. Then it is simple to to keep
inbox clean, but still the filtering is not final solution, but they can be
always unfiltered, if needed.
Brief instruction to filter noise:
1) From
Oh, I almost forgot: For gmail, the action to take upon filter match is
"delete". Others won't get rid of the noise.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:32 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> Although the "kill file" approach doesn't work due to responses, one can
> use email filters such as gmail's to filter no
Although the "kill file" approach doesn't work due to responses, one can
use email filters such as gmail's to filter not only on the "from" field
but on words that occur in the body of the message.
The increase in signal to noise ratio is a pleasure.
5 matches
Mail list logo
