H LV wrote:
I was was imagining some sort of record that could withstand a wide variety
> of conditions.
>
DNA is incredibly resilient. Stored in proper conditions it is expected
last for hundreds of thousands of years. Hundreds of years with today's
techniques, which require that it be kept
I was was imagining some sort of record that could withstand a wide variety
of conditions.
Harry
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:06 AM Jed Rothwell wrote:
> H LV wrote:
>
> I've been thinking, that if one really wants information to last at least
>> millions of year then it should be fossilized.
H LV wrote:
I've been thinking, that if one really wants information to last at least
> millions of year then it should be fossilized.
>
Prof. George Church (Harvard) is developing methods of storing digital data
in DNA. He has stored up to 700 TB per gram so far. He stored his own
biology
I've been thinking, that if one really wants information to last at least
millions of year then it should be fossilized.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 8:14 PM Terry Blanton Their Utah facility records all human electronic information ad
> infinitum. Or until the next asteroid or EMP.
>
> On Wed, Dec
Their Utah facility records all human electronic information ad infinitum.
Or until the next asteroid or EMP.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 9:17 AM Jed Rothwell PM wrote:
>
> >I put everything in the clouds. It will survive forever.
>>
>> ...on the NSA servers, where they have faster access to it than
PM wrote:
>I put everything in the clouds. It will survive forever.
>
> ...on the NSA servers, where they have faster access to it than you do. ;)
>
If the NSA would take an interest in my website, I would be thrilled.
- Jed
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:07:32 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>I put everything in the clouds. It will survive forever.
...on the NSA servers, where they have faster access to it than you do. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
I put everything in the clouds. It will survive forever.
I finished the graph. This shows the difference between an old paper
retyped from scratch, versus an image Acrobat file. New version:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanthepresent.pdf
Old version:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SIFthescience.pdf#page=490
Actually, you cannot see
Nigel Dyer wrote:
> Indeed, but it would have been so much easier if the PhD student had kept
> his raw data for us to produce the graph for the paper
>
it was not a PhD student. It was Prof. Martin Fleischmann. He lost all of
his manuscripts and data when his secretary at the University died
Indeed, but it would have been so much easier if the PhD student had
kept his raw data for us to produce the graph for the paper
On 06/12/2018 15:24, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Nigel Dyer mailto:l...@thedyers.org.uk>> wrote:
I have also had to digitize an old graph recently, and used the
Nigel Dyer wrote:
I have also had to digitize an old graph recently, and used the
> following webpage very succesfully
>
> http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer/app3_12/
That works pretty well, doesn't it? About the same as GetData.
- Jed
I have also had to digitize an old graph recently, and used the
following webpage very succesfully
http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer/app3_12/
Nigel
On 05/12/2018 22:26, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I am digitizing an important old graph from Fleischmann. The process
is illustrated here:
I am digitizing an important old graph from Fleischmann. The process is
illustrated here:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5782-digitizing-an-old-graph-from-fleischmann/?postID=98837#post98837
14 matches
Mail list logo
