No. Good grief. You seem to have a Ph.D. in furious misunderstanding.
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.
Yes. I assume that you refer to drive for an
ber who that was). And I
> remember Jed agreeing with me, so there's at least 3 of us who had it wrong.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jed Rothwell
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:20 AM
> Subject: [Vo]:Eks
internal heat.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Andrew
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, May 27, 2013 3:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.
Ekstrom makes the same point as I have failed to make with Dave (and upon which
nobody else here has raised concern). Here it is
Plot
would yield COP=1?
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Andrew
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.
Ekstrom's critique made me think about the output side more. I've been making
a mis
AM
Subject: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.
"Comments on the report 'Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a
reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder' by Giuseppe Levi et
al."
Peter Ekström, Department of Physics, Lund University
htt
> From: "Jed Rothwell"
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:20:43 AM
>
> "Comments on the report 'Indication of anomalous heat energy
> production in a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel
> powder' by Giuseppe Levi et al."
>
>
> Peter Ekström, Department of Physics, Lund University
>
>
"Comments on the report 'Indication of anomalous heat energy production in
a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder' by Giuseppe Levi
et al."
Peter Ekström, Department of Physics, Lund University
http://nuclearphysics.nuclear.lu.se/lpe/files/62739576.pdf
This document stands as
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo