Hi Mark,
Permission to vent granted.
Let me reciprocate with a few fissures of my own.
Mill's & BLP have often been criticized for giving the appearance of
going off in too many directions, and as such, depleting their limited
resources. To be honest I don't know how justified such complaints
re
SVJ responded:
"OTOH, to be fair to BLP, it's my understanding that the facility is not
financially structured to creating prototypes for industry and consumers.
Just proof-of-concept experimental devices that aren't in their own right
something that can be commercialized - not without a lot of exp
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
wrote:
> Why doesn't Mills FINISH JUST ONE PRODUCT AND GET IT TO MARKET!
AADD
T
Oh shoot!
I thought you meant Rossi.
Regarding Mills, I wholeheartedly agree. :) It's starting to lead me to
believe that something's not there.
Craig
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 09:06 -0400, Craig Haynie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 23:07 -0700, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
> > Why doesn't Mills
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 23:07 -0700, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
> Why doesn't Mills FINISH JUST ONE PRODUCT AND GET IT TO MARKET!
> He's like a little kid who gets 90% done with something and then gets bored
> with it and is off to some new and challenging puzzle... never completing
> what he star
> From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
>
> Why doesn't Mills FINISH JUST ONE PRODUCT AND GET IT TO MARKET!
> He's like a little kid who gets 90% done with something and then gets
> bored
> with it and is off to some new and challenging puzzle... never
> completing
> what he starts.
>
> The only other exp
rks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 6:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FW: Mills CIHT Published World Patent Application
I'd like to know how far in the R&D cycle BLP's interested parties may have
gotten with the CIHT p
>From Jones Beene
>> . . . apparently this is the basis of Mills'
>> latest-and-greatest claim to fame where the excess
>> energy goes direct to electricity.
>From Jed:
> If true, that's the IDEAL source of energy. Nothing better.
> That is the easiest form of energy to convert to other forms
>
Jones Beene wrote:
> . . . apparently this is the basis of Mills'
> latest-and-greatest claim to fame where the excess energy goes direct to
> electricity.
>
If true, that's the IDEAL source of energy. Nothing better. That is the
easiest form of energy to convert to other forms you need, such a
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&adja
cent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20110922&CC=WO&NR=206236A2&KC=A2
There is a lot to wade through here... and I have not found the spark of
brilliance yet, but apparently this is the basis of Mills'
latest-and-greatest
10 matches
Mail list logo
