Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-05 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:37 AM 10/5/2009, Horace Heffner wrote: Supporting this is not my aim. I did not join your list. In fact, I may mount a competing operation at some point if a good experiment emerges. I suggested a similar effort about a year ago on another list, with the difference being that I suggested

Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-05 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: Have you noticed United Nuclear? Seems like a nice company I'm tempted to buy some of their toys. Did you know it was run by Bob Lazar? Yes, he is the same one who allegedly worked in section S4 of Area 51.

Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-05 Thread Horace Heffner
On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: I've purchased some LR-115; I will cut it up, I plan to serialize the chips, and I'll be selling them in small packages. If you want to give some away, you could either subsidize what I'm doing, or you could buy your own material

Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-05 Thread Michel Jullian
2009/10/5 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net: On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: ... Well, not in the cell, and I won't be using it on cells where I want to observe the cathode with a microscope during the experiment. Unless it's on the opposite side, a possibility,

Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-05 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 06:19 PM 10/5/2009, Michel Jullian wrote: 2009/10/5 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net: I wish you success in your research. So do I, Abd. I wish I had more time to contribute to your project, but you seem to be progressing impressively swiftly in spite of the very limited help you've

Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 09:11 PM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote: What has been lacking is testing a (3rd particle) seeding concept as an augmentation to a protocol that has already been shown to work for CF fairly reliably, such as SPAWAR's codeposition methods. Making this easy is part of what I'm trying to do.

Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-04 Thread Horace Heffner
On Oct 4, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 09:11 PM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote: What has been lacking is testing a (3rd particle) seeding concept as an augmentation to a protocol that has already been shown to work for CF fairly reliably, such as SPAWAR's codeposition

[Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-03 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:52 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote: I suggested a possible means to beat this co-location problem (and thus cause fusion) here in 1996. It is described here: http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/BoseHyp.pdf Once we have simple, cheap, standard cells operating and available and being

Re: [Vo]:Following up on a Heffner idea

2009-10-03 Thread Horace Heffner
On Oct 3, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 01:52 AM 10/3/2009, Horace Heffner wrote: I suggested a possible means to beat this co-location problem (and thus cause fusion) here in 1996. It is described here: http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/BoseHyp.pdf Once we have simple,