Re: [Vo]:H-Ni reactions was tested by NASA - why didnt they continue this early research, if it worked?

Am 01.10.2011 00:45, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Peter Heckert mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de>> wrote: Yes, but this is not what is needed. The Rossi device is inaccessible. An accessible and working device is needed to do LENR research. Defkalion says they will begin selling commercial

Re: [Vo]:H-Ni reactions was tested by NASA - why didnt they continue this early research, if it worked?

Peter Heckert wrote: > Yes, but this is not what is needed. > The Rossi device is inaccessible. An accessible and working device is > needed to do LENR research. > Defkalion says they will begin selling commercial quantities of these devices next year. This will make them available to do LENR r

Re: [Vo]:H-Ni reactions was tested by NASA - why didnt they continue this early research, if it worked?

Am 30.09.2011 23:30, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Peter Heckert mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de>> wrote: If this works repeatable and the energy can be reliable proven, then they dont need Rossi and his poprietary secret methods and devices. Assuming the claims made by Rossi and Defkalion

Re: [Vo]:H-Ni reactions was tested by NASA - why didnt they continue this early research, if it worked?

Peter Heckert wrote: > If this works repeatable and the energy can be reliable proven, then they > dont need Rossi and his poprietary secret methods and devices. > Assuming the claims made by Rossi and Defkalion are true, they are far better of any previous version of nickel cold fusion (or the

[Vo]:H-Ni reactions was tested by NASA - why didnt they continue this early research, if it worked?

Am 30.09.2011 21:11, schrieb Jed Rothwell: Peter Heckert mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de>> wrote: I found this document, where NASA found excess heat in H-Ni electrolysis. Could it be this document