an contraction on the single axis approaching C the contraction
> observed due to suppression would be symmetrical with no need for any
> spatial displacement.
>
> Fran
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* David Jonsson [mailto:davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com]
> *Sen
due to suppression would be
symmetrical with no need for any spatial displacement.
Fran
From: David Jonsson [mailto:davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 9:48 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Homogeniety of space and the Lorentz transformations
I was checking the der
Concretely, one should be asking if the laws of motion are isotropic
in a given context.
Experientially they are not, but the mechanical world view insists they are.
Consider a pebble. It does not continue to move in straight line in
the direction it is thrown,
so to overide the experience that mot
I was checking the derivation of the Lorentz transformation and it mentions
that it relies on space being "homogeneous" or on "isotropy of the space".
Why are these assumptions made?
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation#From_physical_principles
And as far as I have read 1 or 2
4 matches
Mail list logo