Claims of fusion by laser with more output energy than input energy
for the first time.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-lasers-fuelling-hopes-of-unlimited-clean-nuclear-energy-9124237.html
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/13
https://www.google.com/search?q=nif+lawrence+livermore&tb
That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds
of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats.
2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe :
> Claims of fusion by laser with more output energy than input energy
> for the first time.
>
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sc
for less than a billionth of a second
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds
> of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats.
>
>
> 2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe :
>
> Claims of fusion by laser wi
Blaze Spinnaker,
"for less than a billionth of a second"
And people complain about calorimetry in LENR
]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported
Blaze Spinnaker,
"for less than a billionth of a second"
And people complain about calorimetry in LENR
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson wrote:
As a skeptic I demand that another independent group of scientists
> replicate the results. How do we know that the input power required to
> run the lasers is accurately measured? The list of possible errors is a
> mile long for an exper
Correct me if I'm wrong but they didn't really achieve OU because the
target only got 10% of the incident energy so the actual energy gain was in
a subsystem rather than in the whole system.
[m]
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Rober
I like your humor Eric.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson wrote:
As a skeptic I demand that another independent group of
> Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 9:44 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson wrote:
>
> As a skeptic I demand that another independent group of scientists
>> replicate the results. How do we know that the
You make good points about different requirements... not that for most
physicist what is assumed by theory is not "extraordinary" thus need no
serious evidence... This is the only and key problem: theory!
In fact I think it is a very many time replicated tragedy. As Thomas Kuhn
and Nassim nicholas
Actually, they considered only what entered the core of D+T. That is about
1/100 000 of the total that enters the whole machine for the shot.
2014-02-13 1:55 GMT-02:00 Mark Gibbs :
> Correct me if I'm wrong but they didn't really achieve OU because the
> target only got 10% of the incident energ
11 matches
Mail list logo