I assume you are kidding Daniel. It might be possible for a very
sophisticated scammer to pull something like this off, but I do not consider
it likely in this case. I have seen a picture of the ECAT opened with someone
using a wrench on the interior heat sink attached box while it was outs
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Bob, excellent idea, this leaking could easily explain the excess heat gain.
You mean excess weight gain.
- Jed
See Mats hands at 7:46 that is the dimension of the reactor:
short: http://goo.gl/T86ek
long:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF8ifZZ_iVo&feature=player_detailpage#t=460s
mic
2011/10/18 Jouni Valkonen :
> Bob, excellent idea, this leaking could easily explain the excess heat gain.
>
> ===
>
>
>
Bob, excellent idea, this leaking could easily explain the excess heat gain.
===
Daniel, I think that skeptics are never assuming that there is
deliberate hoax, but it is just a measurement errors. They have some
sort of fixation to that that it is always measurement error and never
deliberate h
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Jed, how about this:
Enrico Billi tells us that they weighed the E-Cat before and after,
but not why it mysteriously gained a kilogram of weight. I can offer a
plausible explanation. . . .
I would not call that plausible.
Over the past several years, many people have
uires some clarification.
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:How to simulate the four-hour heat after death event in
> your kitchen
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:32:35 -0400
> From: bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> Since the E-cat was leaking, it is likely that the
If I recall correctly, people at the test saw the reactor enclosing as
big as 50cc not 2000cc...
Maybe Raymond Zreick who was present can tell us more. Raymond are
you there? ;-)
mic
2011/10/18 Daniel Rocha :
> Jed, how about this:
>
> Enrico Billi tells us that they weighed the E-Cat before a
: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 5:30 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How to simulate the four-hour heat after death event
in your kitchen
it would also explain the false starts. the solidox might have started
burning, then gone out on its own from cooling too much.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:23 PM
it would also explain the false starts. the solidox might have started
burning, then gone out on its own from cooling too much.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Jed, how about this:
>
> Enrico Billi tells us that they weighed the E-Cat before and after, but not
> why it myst
Jed, how about this:
Enrico Billi tells us that they weighed the E-Cat before and after, but not
why it mysteriously gained a kilogram of weight. I can offer a plausible
explanation.
On the bottom of the E-Cat housing sits a relatively large volume enclosure,
the reactor module, which we are told
People who are convinced that Rossi's recent test did not display any signs
of anomalous energy should do the following test.
Materials: an 8 gallon (30 L) pot; a thermocouple or thermometer; insulating
material; some buckets; a logbook.
1. Fill the pot with 8 gallons (30 L) of water. If you wish
11 matches
Mail list logo
