In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:16:23 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Even a change in the speed of light could be just that, a change in the speed of
light, and may not mean that the rate of flow of time has changed.
>Atomic clocks count time through the counting of atomic vibrations.
Atomic clocks count time through the counting of atomic vibrations. In the
EMdrive experiments, laser beams that when through certain zones in the
resonant cavity showed faster than light behavior.
see
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/49360/20150428/nasa-may-have-accidentally-discovered-faster-t
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 21:22:09 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>This experiment should be viewed through the lenz of our experience with
>the increase in the decay rate of radioactive isotopes. I have referenced
>many times here the experiment where U232 half life was decreased fro
This experiment should be viewed through the lenz of our experience with
the increase in the decay rate of radioactive isotopes. I have referenced
many times here the experiment where U232 half life was decreased from 69
years to 6 microseconds.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 9:09 PM, wrote:
> In reply
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:28:02 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>LENR changes the speed at which time flows by producing negitive vacuum
>energy. Positive vacuum energy make time flow more slowly whereas Negative
>vacuum energy makes time flow faster. This ability to control the spe
LENR changes the speed at which time flows by producing negitive vacuum
energy. Positive vacuum energy make time flow more slowly whereas Negative
vacuum energy makes time flow faster. This ability to control the speed at
which time flows has been experimentally demonstrated in this experiment:
ht
6 matches
Mail list logo
