I have been doing many experiments with magnets recently, and have hundreds
of the most powerful magnets available from e.g.
http://www.forcefieldmagnets.com/catalog/index.php
http://www.supermagnetman.net/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NdFeB#Other_dangers
From Hoyt:
Very interesting speculation. Thanks.
From tests I have done, Sv can be from microseconds to seconds depending on
the material. It's on the order of a millisecond for Nd2Fe14B.
Hoyt Stearns
Thanks, Hoyt,
From microseconds to seconds. Wow! That's a huge range!
I would seem
I think this issue was addressed by an experiment in fizzx.com, a
spin-off of the Steorn forum. It would have been in one of the
Whipmag threads. If I have time today, I'll see if I can find it.
Terry
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:12 PM, OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope I am posing
From Terry Blanton:
I think this issue was addressed by an experiment in fizzx.com, a
spin-off of the Steorn forum. It would have been in one of the
Whipmag threads. If I have time today, I'll see if I can find it.
Much appreciated, Terry. Let us know if you find the appropriate links.
I hope I am posing this question concerning the characteristics of
magnetic properties using proper terminology. My apologies up front if
not.
The following two questions are related to each other:
(1) Does anyone know how fast magnetic viscosity on average tends to
propagate (or cycle) through
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:13 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Magnetic viscosity question: generating a harmonic
frequency
I hope I am posing this question concerning the characteristics of
magnetic properties using proper terminology. My apologies up front if
not.
The following two
what about stochastic resonance then?
On 05/05/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it conceivable that Barkhausen noise could provide a source of
quantum energy?
Terry
On 5/5/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today:
On 5/6/07, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about stochastic resonance then?
Rutherford Berkhausen Steorn.
No, not the latest law firm; nor, a new wave band. However it *is*
helping me to understand what these Irish laddies are talking about.
Rutherford essentially defined magnetic
this seems very interesting! youve given me a lot of places to go into, and
ive added Barkhausen and Rutherford onto the PESWiki timeline (
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Timeline ).
now im looking at Harvard University pictures of Chladni Plates, and saw
even an electromagnetic Chladni Plate --
They *must* use resonance in a solid state version. This is what had
kept bothering me was the subtle hints of a solid state ORBO
(realORBOllocks). I believe that using a cross-field interference
alignment they can maximize the domain flip efficiency.
H. There should be an optimum
Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=57711page=1#Item_17
http://snipurl.com/1jgm1
about how his technology works. Isn't this the same as hysteresis?
Terry
Is it conceivable that Barkhausen noise could provide a source of
quantum energy?
Terry
On 5/5/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=57711page=1#Item_17
http://snipurl.com/1jgm1
about how
Terry Blanton wrote:
Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=57711page=1#Item_17
http://snipurl.com/1jgm1
about how his technology works. Isn't this the same as hysteresis?
Terry
I was taught it's different than hysteresis.
On 5/5/07, Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was taught it's different than hysteresis. Magnetic viscosity is frequency
related. It's simply magnetic lag. The electron spins in the material don't
change instantly when the applied field changes.
Okay, for a fixed field strength, it
Paul Lowrance wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=57711page=1#Item_17
http://snipurl.com/1jgm1
about how his technology works. Isn't this the same as hysteresis?
Terry
I was taught it's
Terry Blanton wrote:
Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=57711page=1#Item_17
http://snipurl.com/1jgm1
about how his technology works. Isn't this the same as hysteresis?
Yah, or an answer to the burning question, does
I first heard about magnetic viscosity (V[s])a few weeks ago. As I
understand it, there's a time delay in ferromagnetic materials between an
applied H field and the corresponding B field (and in reverse also --
removing the H field).
If I spin a magnet over a ferromagnetic disc (assume
17 matches
Mail list logo
