In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:21:46 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>This then is the very reason that ballotechnics are said to be MORE energetic,
>not less. IOW you want the particle to burn away the surface area of atoms of
>small particles very rapidly but ONLY the surface
- Original Message
From: leaking pen
> Hunh, doesnt seem that way to me. High dispersal and insane surface to
area ratio is known for doing just that in chemical reactions and
explosions. Look at fuel air explosives.
Yes!- of course this ratio is important. But NOT for the reason you
Hunh, doesnt seem that way to me. High dispersal and insane surface to
area ratio is known for doing just that in chemical reactions and
explosions. Look at fuel air explosives.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:08 AM, R C Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy Jones,
> There's folks on Vo, and ther
Howdy Jones,
There's folks on Vo, and there's folks looking over the shoulder's of folks on
Vo. This group's attraction is passed on to many others and be assured " they
get it". I suppose your mention of "red mercury" did make a few ears become
"pointed". The Dime Box Saloon's Large Hadron teq
- Original Message
From: Robin van Spaandonk
> I have wondered about He iso H undergoing shrinkage, and have previously also
suggested that perhaps virtually any nucleus could steal a shrunken electron
from a Hydrino. However I doubt that there is really anything like this going on
in "s
The pool of tears wonderland-style:
Ok the following may be venturing way down into the rabbitt hole of Alice, so
it is worth prefeacing these remarks as being generally unrelated to the prior
discussion about thermite - such as used in demolition.
Question to the Cheshire Cat: What do the
6 matches
Mail list logo
