Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it
been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully
run it?
Nope --- But if you trust a dog (Shih-tzu), Dr Bob has some comments on
Schwartz's presentation :
http://www.drboblog.com/where-is-bob/ (Jan
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it
been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully
run it?
Nope --- But if you trust a dog (Shih-tzu), Dr Bob has some comments on
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it?
Thanks in advance.
[mg]
Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
Probably the most info publicly available:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.
Probably the
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
And the video is AWOL. Sigh.
Damn. Well the .pdf is there:
http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
And the video is AWOL. Sigh.
Damn. Well the .pdf is there:
I read that ... which is to say I scanned it but I can't draw any
conclusions from it. Anyone willing to apply their huge brain to that
document and summarize it? Thanks in advance.
[m]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM,
There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than
Barry Simon's (that I know).
Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
was re-posted by me here:
http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/
Hagelstein's video is of
technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than Barry
Simon's (that I know).
Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times
was
I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?
[m]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
There was no other video of the
Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient.
Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source.
Science is magnificent, technology works for us.
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
I must be behind the curve ... and
Peter,
Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking
about?
[mg]
On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote:
Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient.
Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source.
Science is
NANOR scaled-up from milliwatts up. Nothing to do with vodka.
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Peter,
Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking
about?
[mg]
On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote:
Easy to
http://www.iscmns.org/work10/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf
T
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.iscmns.org/work10/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf
I have difficulty understanding these graphs. They show so much they are
confusing. Power on one axis and energy (in joules) on another. I am
not familiar with the instruments or measurement techniques
17 matches
Mail list logo