Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-02-02 Thread Alan Fletcher
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it? Nope --- But if you trust a dog (Shih-tzu), Dr Bob has some comments on Schwartz's presentation : http://www.drboblog.com/where-is-bob/ (Jan

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-02-02 Thread Harry Veeder
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it? Nope --- But if you trust a dog (Shih-tzu), Dr Bob has some comments on

[Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it? Thanks in advance. [mg]

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
Swartz has been very secretive. His web site: http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote: Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Swartz has been very secretive. His web site: http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html Probably the most info publicly available:

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Swartz has been very secretive. His web site: http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff. Probably the

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote: And the video is AWOL. Sigh. Damn. Well the .pdf is there: http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote: And the video is AWOL. Sigh. Damn. Well the .pdf is there:

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
I read that ... which is to say I scanned it but I can't draw any conclusions from it. Anyone willing to apply their huge brain to that document and summarize it? Thanks in advance. [m] On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM,

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Ruby
There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than Barry Simon's (that I know). Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times was re-posted by me here: http://coldfusionnow.org/2nd-week-summary-of-cold-fusion-101/ Hagelstein's video is of

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Peter Gluck
technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR Peter On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote: There was no other video of the NANOR publicly available other than Barry Simon's (that I know). Mitchell Swartz's two summary of the course posted on Cold Fusion Times was

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be? [m] On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: technologists are waiting for KILOR and MEGAR Peter On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote: There was no other video of the

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Peter Gluck
Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient. Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source. Science is magnificent, technology works for us. Peter On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote: I must be behind the curve ... and

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Mark Gibbs
Peter, Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking about? [mg] On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote: Easy to answer: something GREAT(ER) - much greater, useful and efficient. Generating intense heat, usable as a practical energy source. Science is

Re: [Vo]:Nanor

2013-01-31 Thread Peter Gluck
NANOR scaled-up from milliwatts up. Nothing to do with vodka. Peter On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote: Peter, Come on! Are those acronyms, flavors of vodka, ... What are you talking about? [mg] On Thursday, January 31, 2013, Peter Gluck wrote: Easy to

Re: [Vo]:NANOR at M.I.T.

2012-05-29 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.iscmns.org/work10/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf T

Re: [Vo]:NANOR at M.I.T.

2012-05-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.iscmns.org/work10/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf I have difficulty understanding these graphs. They show so much they are confusing. Power on one axis and energy (in joules) on another. I am not familiar with the instruments or measurement techniques