This was not piloted by me. I may crash RC airplanes but I do not violate DC airspace with them.

See:

<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/26/us/26drone.html?scp=1&sq=navy%20drone%20fire%20scout&st=cse>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/26/us/26drone.html?scp=1&sq=navy%20drone%20fire%20scout&st=cse

This is a fairly hilarious description in the deadpan N. Y. Times style.

QUOTES with snide comments by me in square brackets:

Navy Drone Violated Washington Airspace

By ELISABETH BUMILLER

WASHINGTON ­ The skies over the nation’s capital are crowded with presidential aircraft, military flyovers and the Delta shuttle, but this month a strange new bird was briefly among them: a United States Navy drone that wandered into the restricted airspace around Washington before operators could stop it.

Navy spokesmen could not say Wednesday if anyone on the ground was alarmed by the drone ­ officially an MQ-8B Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff and Landing unmanned aerial vehicle ­ which looks like a small windowless helicopter and was flying at 2,000 feet. The Navy did say that the drone got within 40 miles of Washington before operators were able to re-establish communication and guide it back to its base in southern Maryland.

Still, the Aug. 2 incident resulted in the grounding of all six of the Navy’s Fire Scouts as well as an inquiry into what went wrong. The Navy is calling the problem a “software issue” that foiled the drone’s operators.

Or, as Cmdr. Danny Hernandez, a Navy spokesman, put it: “When they lose contact with the Fire Scout, there’s a program that’s supposed to have it immediately return to the airfield to land safely. That did not happen as planned.” [I guess not!]

Navy spokesmen said the Fire Scout, made by Northrop Grumman, was a little more than an hour into a test flight operating out of Naval Air Station Patuxent River on the Chesapeake Bay when operators lost its control link. The drone then flew 23 miles on a north-by-northwest course to enter Washington’s restricted airspace. A half-hour later, Navy spokesmen said, operators re-established control and the drone landed safely back at Patuxent.

The Navy did not describe the scene inside the ground control station as operators sought to re-establish communication with the drone. . . . [Best left to the imagination, in any case.]

- Jed

Reply via email to