In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:34:49 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>--- Robin van Spaandonk
>
>> Perhaps one implication is that each that each quark
>comprises a pair of particles, each with a mass Pi^5
>times that of the electron.
>
>Well...
>
>Don't keep us in suspense...or
... shouldn't have been so precise - a better
cadndidate is the tau neutrino.
Upper bound on the tau-neutrino mass from the
previously unobserved decay mode is 157 MeV
--- Robin van Spaandonk
> Perhaps one implication is that each that each quark
comprises a pair of particles, each with a mass Pi^5
times that of the electron.
Well...
Don't keep us in suspense...or are we supposed to put
on a copy of Firesign and try to guess the disease
before it's too late
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:55:41 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>oops - (my copy editor is late arriving, once again)
>
> > and so the neutron being about ~1838 times more massive ...
>
>should be more massive than an electron... and there are certain to be
>other errors of haste
IMHO, such a task is similar to find the boundaries & size of -->
http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/b/bc/300px-Femtosecond_pulse_shapes.svg.png
One would need to define the critical threshold; e.g., 70% max could be
considered the boundary of the wave/particle.
Paul Lowranc
leaking pen wrote:
it may never be possible. you assume they MUST have an actual
definate unchanging size. i would think that a natural consequence of
string theory would be that they couldn't, and would in fact pulsate
at different rates and amounts.
but there would always be an 'ave
oops - (my copy editor is late arriving, once again)
> and so the neutron being about ~1838 times more massive ...
should be more massive than an electron... and there are certain to be
other errors of haste.
BTW in one Physics model the proton, with 3 constituent quarks, has 3
times the mas
it may never be possible. you assume they MUST have an actual
definate unchanging size. i would think that a natural consequence of
string theory would be that they couldn't, and would in fact pulsate
at different rates and amounts.
On 6/28/07, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW - For
BTW - For those who might harbor a lingering suspicion that many things
in physics, from the basics to the complex, are not well known in 2007 -
consider something as basic as the diameter and geometry of the
particles of matter: electron, proton, and neutron.
There is no firm agreement (or ev
9 matches
Mail list logo
