Abd wrote:
Mark, you are focusing on the name of the thing rather than the reality. For
our purposes, wet
steam is a 2-phase system in equilibrium at the boiling point. The size of the
phase regions is not
relevant.
IMHO, that's being sloppy. If we're really serious about getting to the truth,
Indeed, Krivits psychological interpretation on Mats Lewan's video was so
convincing, that I almost believed it! Quite impressive. However, it would
be good to have accurate temporal temperature graph for both April E-Cats.
If power manipulation hypothesis is true, it should be shown as
At 03:27 AM 8/10/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
I think it is obvious that the vapor will be traveling faster than
ANY liquid water that is part of
a layer of liquid on the inner wall of the hose, due to the adhesion
of the liquid to the hose.
Sure. I don't think there will be much of that.
At 01:47 AM 8/9/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
Abd stated:
So what happens? Half the water spills into the tube, half is
vaporized and also flows into the
tube. This is 50% quality steam, in the tube.
I think that is a misunderstanding on your part, Abd.
The 'wet' in wet steam is ONLY suspended
On Aug 8, 2011 6:45 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Uh, Jouni, the wetness in steam is liquid water
droplets. What did you think it was?
You do not have sense of what is large droplet and and what is tiny droplet
such as in fog.
But I pardon me, that i should make this
coverage of Rossi - Defkalion split
It may come for a surprise for many, but there is no such thing as water
boiler that produces a steam with quality much less than 95%, in close to
normal pressure. Very wet steam just is not stable state, because surface
tension makes sure that wetness in steam
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
NyTeknik maintains that the liquid mass is at most 10% (steam quality at
least 90%) and because of this there is no significant error in measuring
the heat output using the steam.
That's based on a steam expert, apparently, who has probably
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
This is in line with what I have heard from other experts.
That's right. But now ask those experts what will happen if the feed
water spills into the outlet tube. They have never seen such a thing.
On the contrary this is a common occurrence. It happens when
At 06:41 AM 8/8/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
On Aug 8, 2011 6:45 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Uh, Jouni, the wetness in steam is liquid water
droplets. What did you think it was?
You do not have sense of what is large droplet
and and what
At 10:08 AM 8/8/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
NyTeknik maintains that the liquid mass is at most 10% (steam
quality at least 90%) and because of this there is no significant
error in measuring the heat output using the
At 10:08 AM 8/8/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
With some tests of the eCat we can rule this out. It seems unlikely
to me that it works in some tests but not others.
Overflow water allows the E-cat to have an appearance of similar
performance over a wide range of actual energies.
My conclusion
At 10:15 AM 8/8/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
This is in line with what I have heard from other experts.
That's right. But now ask those experts what will happen if the
feed water spills into the outlet tube. They have never seen such a thing.
On the contrary this
Hey, Abd, may be the best way to catalyze thinking would be to set up
a simple experiment to make a cell phone video:
a simple transparent hot water system to model the behavior of a Rossi
reactor: Rich Murray 2011.08.08
Use glass bottle with a long neck going from the side up at an angle,
or a
Abd stated:
So what happens? Half the water spills into the tube, half is vaporized and
also flows into the
tube. This is 50% quality steam, in the tube.
I think that is a misunderstanding on your part, Abd.
The 'wet' in wet steam is ONLY suspended water droplets, NOT water condensed on
the
Good coverage. You should read this:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3228376.ece
It will be updated tomorrow with comments from Defkalion.
Note also the comments about Krivit and steam enthalpy in the last
paragraphs.
- Jed
NyTeknik maintains that the liquid mass is at most 10% (steam quality at
least 90%) and because of this there is no significant error in measuring
the heat output using the steam.
It may come for a surprise for many, but there is no such thing as water
boiler that produces a steam with quality much less than 95%, in close to
normal pressure. Very wet steam just is not stable state, because surface
tension makes sure that wetness in steam is quickly converted into liquid
At 07:58 PM 8/7/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
NyTeknik maintains that the liquid mass is at most 10% (steam
quality at least 90%) and because of this there is no significant
error in measuring the heat output using the steam.
That's based on a steam expert, apparently, who has probably never
At 08:29 PM 8/7/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Well, this is not NyTeknik's claim. They quote someone else. The article says:
[...] From other cases with evaporation in tubes I would guess that
the steam quality is at least 90%.
This is in line with what I have heard from other experts.
That's
At 10:09 PM 8/7/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
It may come for a surprise for many, but there is no such thing as
water boiler that produces a steam with quality much less than 95%,
in close to normal pressure. Very wet steam just is not stable
state, because surface tension makes sure that
20 matches
Mail list logo
