I've been reading Passerini's tweets, and it looks like this eCat has
been running in self-sustained mode for about 4 hours now.
https://twitter.com/#!/22passi
Craig
Nice one, will start following 22passi
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.comwrote:
I've been reading Passerini's tweets, and it looks like this eCat has
been running in self-sustained mode for about 4 hours now.
https://twitter.com/#!/22passi
Craig
At 09:19 AM 10/6/2011, Craig Haynie wrote:
I've been reading Passerini's
tweets, and it looks like this eCat has
been running in self-sustained mode for about 4 hours now.
https://twitter.com/#!/22passi
I make it not quite an HOUR :
22passi Daniele Passerini
the E-Cat goes on in autosustaining
22passi http://twitter.com/#!/22passi Daniele Passerini
The E-Cat module keeps working in self-sustained mode
45 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#!/22passi/status/121983529868468224
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 09:19 AM 10/6/2011, Craig Haynie wrote:
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I make it not quite an HOUR :
22passi http://twitter.com/#!/22passi Daniele Passerini
the E-Cat goes on in autosustaining
51 minutes ago http://twitter.com/#!/22passi/status/121981413682724864
Did you auto-translate that somewhere? The Google version
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 10:05 -0700, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 09:19 AM 10/6/2011, Craig Haynie wrote:
I've been reading Passerini's tweets, and it looks like this eCat
has
been running in self-sustained mode for about 4 hours now.
https://twitter.com/#!/22passi
I make it not quite an
At 10:28 AM 10/6/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher
a...@well.com wrote:
I make it not quite an HOUR :
22passi Daniele Passerini
the E-Cat goes on in autosustaining
51
minutes ago
Did you auto-translate that somewhere? The Google version says 4 hours,
as does the original
22passi Daniel Passerini
At 19:00, after 4 hours in continuous self-sustaining mode, the reaction
has been interrupted as planned...
If confirmed, this should remove all doubt.
Woot...
Craig
22passi Daniele Passerini
At 19:00, after 4 hours in continuous self-sustaining mode, the reaction
has been interrupted as planned...
3
minutes ago Favorite
Gee .. I thought they were going for 12+ hours.
22passi Daniele Passerini
...the end of the operations is planned for 00:00.
3
minutes
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
From Chrome : (But I DID turn on auto-translate for 22passi's website
: maybe it's a global setting. I'll unset it.)
http://twitter.com/#!/22passi http://twitter.com/#%21/22passi
--- but I'm getting new posts in English, not Italian ?
I believe he is now
1666 ml/s should be 166.7 ml/s but it still results in 3.5 kW
This was 1/50 of the 1MW assembly, so it should be putting out
20kw. 3.5kw is a disappointment.
And so is the fact that it ran for only 4 hours, which may not
rule out a chemical reaction.
If that is the best Rossi can do I guess
Hi,
On 6-10-2011 22:30, vorl bek wrote:
1666 ml/s should be 166.7 ml/s but it still results in 3.5 kW
This was 1/50 of the 1MW assembly, so it should be putting out
20kw. 3.5kw is a disappointment.
Excuse me?
This would result still for 52 eCats in 182 kW !
Kind regards,
MoB
Hi,
On 6-10-2011 22:32, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
On 6-10-2011 22:30, vorl bek wrote:
1666 ml/s should be 166.7 ml/s but it still results in 3.5 kW
This was 1/50 of the 1MW assembly, so it should be putting out
20kw. 3.5kw is a disappointment.
Excuse me?
This would result still for 52 eCats
Hi,
On 6-10-2011 22:32, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
On 6-10-2011 22:30, vorl bek wrote:
1666 ml/s should be 166.7 ml/s but it still results in 3.5 kW
This was 1/50 of the 1MW assembly, so it should be putting out
20kw. 3.5kw is a disappointment.
Excuse me?
This would result still
.875kw is the power of a coffee machine of Krivitz test!
Am 06.10.2011 22:36, schrieb Man on Bridges:
Hi,
On 6-10-2011 22:32, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
On 6-10-2011 22:30, vorl bek wrote:
1666 ml/s should be 166.7 ml/s but it still results in 3.5 kW
This was 1/50 of the 1MW assembly, so it should be putting out
20kw. 3.5kw is a disappointment.
vorl bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
This was 1/50 of the 1MW assembly, so it should be putting out
20kw. 3.5kw is a disappointment.
In what universe is that a disappointment? If any other cold fusion test
have produced 50.4 MJ in four hours with no input the researchers would
think they
At 01:42 PM 10/6/2011, vorl bek wrote:
Rossi was touting the ecats as putting out 6kw or more each. Now
we are down to .875kw.
It sounds like this whole ecat OU business is no more than a fantasy.
(.875 + 0) / 0 = ..?
This test was probably limited by the water flow and heat
vorl bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
This was 1/50 of the 1MW assembly, so it should be putting out
20kw. 3.5kw is a disappointment.
In what universe is that a disappointment? If any other cold
fusion test have produced 50.4 MJ in four hours with no input
the researchers would
There is no indication that this is the best Rossi can do.
I think that want limits the COP of the E-Cat is controllablility. Rossi has
been trading off contollability against power density for a long while now
over many design iterations.
This demo is the “weakest yet” per reactor core
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This demo is the “weakest yet” per reactor core power density.
What is the reactor core size?
What was the highest output power during the initial powered phase?
- Jed
21 matches
Mail list logo
