Craig Haynie wrote:
There has never been a time in the 400 years of European settlements
in North American when government did not intervene often and
forcefully in the use of some types of private property.
I agree that governments DO this sort of thing, but they shouldn't
do this sort of t
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Craig Haynie wrote:
>
> I have to disagree with the implications of his email. In a free society,
>> people don't get together and 'vote' on how to use other people's property.
>> With regard to oil, it is not for anyone to decide how it's to
Craig Haynie wrote:
I have to disagree with the implications of his email. In a free
society, people don't get together and 'vote' on how to use other
people's property. With regard to oil, it is not for anyone to
decide how it's to be used . . .
That is incorrect. In cases when property ave
I have to disagree with the implications of his email. In a free society,
people don't get together and 'vote' on how to use other people's property.
With regard to oil, it is not for anyone to decide how it's to be used, or
if it's to be replaced, or what price is to be paid for it, other than the
See:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/13/AR2009071302852.html
This really is on topic, I promise.
Her comments are a distillation of Republican energy policy. She does
not acknowledge even the possibility that:
* Oil is a finite resource and we should be moving ra
5 matches
Mail list logo
