- Original Message -
From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Parksie gets it wrong yet again
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Fri, 22 Feb 2008
16:48:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I h
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:48:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>I haven't been following the list lately (bad Steve) so maybe someone
>(Jones?) has already covered this, but the question of *WHY* the U.S.
>chose to shoot down that satellite is an interesting one.
>
> Fr
[Reporting from home with the wrong return address . . .]
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>Ballistic missile warheads reenter with a velocity of something like
>mach 20. A "balloon" dropped from such a warhead would not "drift
>away"; rather, it would do something closer to "splatter".
The balloon
Jed Rothwell wrote:
[Reporting from home with the wrong return address . . .]
thomas malloy wrote:
Last night on the BBC news they reported the then breaking news
that the American missile had hit the spy satellite. I couldn't
help but smile, Parksie was wrong yet again. Long term Vortexians
[Reporting from home with the wrong return address . . .]
thomas malloy wrote:
>Last night on the BBC news they reported the then breaking news that the
>American missile had hit the spy satellite. I couldn't help but smile,
>Parksie was wrong yet again. Long term Vortexians will recall his
>a
Last night on the BBC news they reported the then breaking news that the
American missile had hit the spy satellite. I couldn't help but smile,
Parksie was wrong yet again. Long term Vortexians will recall his
attacks on the antimissile system. It was a waste of money, a government
boondoggle,
6 matches
Mail list logo
