Re: [Vo]:Q-wave may be weak

2012-04-21 Thread Alain Sepeda
you don't compare the same level of understanding DGT reactor, like Rossi, and Brillouin are intrinsically safe for the same reason, melting DGT internet supervision is a maintenance problem, unrelated to stability/safety, except on long term knowledge and failure anticipation DGT have a phenome

Re: [Vo]:Q-wave may be weak

2012-04-21 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Axil Axil An: vortex-l Gesendet: 21:44 Samstag, 21.April 2012 Betreff: [Vo]:Q-wave may be weak >Reading between the lines, it sounds like Brilliuon Energy is concerned about >the low efficiency of their reaction in >terms of COP. This area

Re: [Vo]:Q-wave may be weak

2012-04-21 Thread Alan Fletcher
Associated article at http://pesn.com/2012/04/19/9602078_Brillouin--Understanding_How_LENR_Works_Will_Enable_Us_to_Be_First/ - Original Message - > From: "Axil Axil" > Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 12:44:38 PM > Subject: [Vo]:Q-wave may be weak > > Sterlling A

[Vo]:Q-wave may be weak

2012-04-21 Thread Axil Axil
Regarding: Sterlling Allan interviews Brilliuon Energy. http://www.mevio.com/episode/313695/fen.120417 A COP of 2.9 for the “wet system” that Brilliuon Energy has currently developed is not going to be competitive in the marketplace for providing hot water. The Q-wave stimulant of the reaction is