On Oct 29, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Which can make a delta T of even 1/2 to one degree C. - seemingly
low to the
outside observer, but really rather significant, when you consider the
actual number of nuclear events per second for the small amount of
reactant.
Earthtech could
Which can make a delta T of even 1/2 to one degree C. - seemingly low to the
outside observer, but really rather significant, when you consider the
actual number of nuclear events per second for the small amount of reactant.
Earthtech could possibly detect massive radiation if they would look for
2009/10/28, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :
> ...I believe that Earthtech has a very accurate
> calorimeter. If they got no excess heat, that would make their
> finding of no radiation quite understandable!
Not so. Detecting excess heat takes far more nuclear events than
detecting radiation with a SSNTD, at
At 09:05 AM 10/27/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
Some of the Hyde parts, while obviously not always factual (Abd --I
gather he prefers to be called by this name, which is why Mr Hyde
called him Dennis-- is obviously not on a crusade against the WL
theory) are interesting and informative though.
Th
Jed sez:
...
> It may be that a few people who spend a lot of effort disputing
> the Mills theory. I have heard there are some on the Mills
> discussion group. But that is an unusual case. That theory
> attracts a lot of interest.
...
You speculate "it may be" ???
It certainly has generated pl
One can only applaud the parts of Steve's post below which were
written by the Dr Jekyll in him, such as this excerpt:
"I applaud your quest for truth, progress and improvement in our
energy options and I thank you for your care and interest along these
lines. I do hope that you and I can eventual
At 07:08 AM 10/22/2009, you wrote:
Steven,
The summary of your article provided by Michel Jullian (below) shows
the impression your style creates. You are not helping yourself or the
field by this approach. First of all, some of your facts are wrong.
Mckubre is not on the nominating committee a
Michel,
Your summary is yours, I really can't and don't wish to comment on that.
Thank you for alerting me to the typo.
Steve
At 11:58 PM 10/21/2009, you wrote:
Thanks for this very interesting report Steven.
Summary (correct me if I misunderstood) :
- Dardik's SuperWaves are a scam, their
Thanks for this very interesting report Steven.
Summary (correct me if I misunderstood) :
- Dardik's SuperWaves are a scam, their application to CF is entirely
PR stuff based on concepts stolen from the Widom Larsen theory for CF.
- McKubre and Fleishmann support Dardik and SuperWaves because of
9 matches
Mail list logo
