The outward pressure generates the gravitational field of matter, matter's
inertial mass and the properties of Spec Relativity.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter7.html#Pg8
Frank Z
In regard to the contents of:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CasimirGenerator.pdf
the lateral Casimir force between a square plate edge and an adjecent
parallel plate is not the same as for a beveled plate edge and
opposing plate, and thus a net energy gain is feasible from a Casimir
Am 05.09.2011 23:56, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Good question Peter,
A possible answer begins on page 7 of:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CasimirGenerator.pdf
The lateral forces on capacitor plates is due to fringe fields. The
Casimir force is highly non-linear, so fringe forces differ
Am 06.09.2011 17:58, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Am 06.09.2011 02:20, schrieb francis:
Which is to say we outside the cavity appear to be the Paradox twin
approaching C and slowing down due to time dilation relative to the
modified ratio of V^2/C^2 inside the cavity.
Interesting thought.
Could
Am 06.09.2011 18:31, schrieb Peter Heckert:
BTW, this theory
http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/prevens/casimir/casimir.htm
could possibly explain how the coloumb wall is overcome in nanoscaled
inhomogenous condensed matter systems, but it denies classic Casimir
Force.
So, what should I
: Relativistic Casimir Cavities
Am 06.09.2011 17:58, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Am 06.09.2011 02:20, schrieb francis:
Which is to say we outside the cavity appear to be the Paradox twin approaching
C and slowing down due to time dilation relative to the modified ratio of
V^2/C^2 inside the cavity
@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:RE: Relativistic Casimir Cavities
Am 06.09.2011 18:31, schrieb Peter Heckert:
BTW, this theory
http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/prevens/casimir/casimir.htm
could possibly explain how the coloumb wall is overcome in nanoscaled
inhomogenous condensed
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.09.2011 18:31, schrieb Peter Heckert:
BTW, this theory
http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/prevens/casimir/casimir.htm
could possibly explain how the coloumb wall is overcome in
nanoscaled inhomogenous condensed matter systems, but it
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.09.2011 17:58, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Am 06.09.2011 02:20, schrieb francis:
Which is to say we outside the cavity appear to be the Paradox
twin approaching C and slowing down due to time dilation
relative to the modified ratio of
Electron-nucleus interaction probabilities are increased by the
increase in the near nucleus electron density. This premise may sound
far fetched, but the chemical-nuclear relationship is no longer
easily dismissed because it has been firmly established with regard
to electron capture. 18
Am 06.09.2011 21:18, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.09.2011 18:31, schrieb Peter Heckert:
BTW, this theory
http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/prevens/casimir/casimir.htm
could possibly explain how the coloumb wall is overcome in
nanoscaled
On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 05.09.2011 23:56, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Good question Peter,
A possible answer begins on page 7 of:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CasimirGenerator.pdf
The lateral forces on capacitor plates is due to fringe fields.
The Casimir
On Sep 6, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.09.2011 21:18, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.09.2011 18:31, schrieb Peter Heckert:
BTW, this theory
http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/prevens/casimir/casimir.htm
could possibly
Hi Frank,
I was thinking about this some time ago.
I see these problems:
When we make the Casimir plates then we must create two surfaces that
fit exactly together. This requires energy. There are some simple
possibilities:
1) We break a piece of metal and then we have two pieces that fit
Good question Peter,
A possible answer begins on page 7 of:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CasimirGenerator.pdf
The lateral forces on capacitor plates is due to fringe fields. The
Casimir force is highly non-linear, so fringe forces differ from
electrostatic forces, and this
Hi Peter,
As with Scott I agree with most of what you said to the
extent that you pursued it but disagree with your assumption that I have any
interest in a moving plate to derive energy or in Scott's pursuit of a
mirror that can absorb energy and then reradiate it unequally in a
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Of course it have to
be very small. 8)
Speaking of small motors:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14763223
T
On Sep 5, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Horace Heffner
hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Of course it have to
be very small. 8)
Speaking of small motors:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14763223
T
This is cool. Too bad it requires
I wrote: The activator could be planar, or cylindrical, or conical,
etc., with the stator shaped to mate surfaces.
Should have said: The activator surface could be planar, or
cylindrical, or conical, etc., with the *rotor* (armature) shaped to
mate surfaces.
Best regards,
Horace
Scott,
Sorry for the late response but found a couple small nits to
pick. I am ok with your synopsis for a moving plate [snip] we are left with
a net radiation pressure of the larger waves outside of the cavity that act
only on the outside of the cavity, pushing the one-moveable
20 matches
Mail list logo
