On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:12 PM, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> This is based on the assumption that the actual operating temperature is
>> indeed
>> 400C @ 15 kW. If it's in fact much less, then 130 kW for a short period
>> may not
>> be a problem.
In an earlier post svj wrote:
"As best as I can tell, you appear to be transfixed at ground zero,
seemingly
acting as the last remaining sane skeptic in this sorry gullible world, the
one last intelligent, logical, rational, person left who knows better, who
knows he is absolutely certain Rossi's
>From Joshua:
...
> Eventually, in a few years Rossi will simply fade away
> like Patterson from the 90s, and the CF community will
> make excuses like his stock of lucky catalyst ran out
> and he found he was unable to make more, and you will
> refuse to admit you were wrong.
Thank you for shar
2011/5/10 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>
>
> We will all know soon enuf whether Rossi's controversial e-cats
> deliver the bacon, or not.
>
>
Actually, I don't think we (meaning you) will know. Judging from past
practice, Rossi's device is unlikely to come to a definitive end. There will
be tech
>From Joshua:
> In other words, you've got nothin' but vague,
> unsupported insults.
In my view, it doesn't matter if my vague unsupported insults (which I
freely admit were done at your expense) are correct or not.
You seem to believe that you have Rossi's occasionally troubling heat
measuremen
In other words, you've got nothin' but vague, unsupported insults.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:59 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <
orionwo...@charter.net> wrote:
> Joshua,
>
> You are free to express your opinion on the Rossi's e-Cat matter, and you
> certainly have done that in more than
6 matches
Mail list logo
