Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes

2012-06-19 Thread David Roberson
for an outer supporting structure which can easily compensate. Dave -Original Message- From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 1:41 am Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes Axil, IMHO, the following is my

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes

2012-06-18 Thread Jojo Jaro
Interesting Axil, but this goes back to my original question. 930K is CVD reactor temps. So, was the Original Rossi ECat a CVD reactor? If so, what could possibly have prompted Rossi to redesign his ECat into a FatCat. Would a Spark Discharge reactor work better than a CVD based reactor? As

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes

2012-06-18 Thread Axil Axil
There was a BIG change in Rossi’s design when he when from 100 grams of powder to 1 gram. I don’t remember if the ash he submitted for assay was produced by a reactor from the 100 grams design or the 1 gram design. Rossi now says that his reactor is operating in a stable mode. 40 days of stable

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes

2012-06-18 Thread Jojo Jaro
posts. Jojo - Original Message - From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 6:09 AM Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes There was a BIG change in Rossi’s design when he when from 100 grams of powder to 1 gram. I don’t