time.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:22:26 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Good
, 2008 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:36:24 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Seriously though Jones, have a look at Nanosolar's latest declarations (last
few days) and tell me if they still don't make sense to you
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:22:26 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Good point ;-) But their argument that city scale utility plants cost less per
watt than rooftop residential installations makes sense, so it might be a
win-win case.
Michel
Well it does provide a ready market
, April 18, 2008 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:23:43 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Nick,
Yes, this low efficiency is undoubtedly true for now.
But here is the (possible) paradigm shift, and I should have tried
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:36:24 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Seriously though Jones, have a look at Nanosolar's latest declarations (last
few days) and tell me if they still don't make sense to you:
http://blog.nanosolar.com/
[snip]
Quote:
There is a reason why one of the
5 matches
Mail list logo