[Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-19 Thread Michel Jullian
time. Michel - Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 1:52 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:22:26 +0200: Hi, [snip] Good

[Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-18 Thread Michel Jullian
, 2008 5:52 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:36:24 +0200: Hi, [snip] Seriously though Jones, have a look at Nanosolar's latest declarations (last few days) and tell me if they still don't make sense to you

Re: [Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-18 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:22:26 +0200: Hi, [snip] Good point ;-) But their argument that city scale utility plants cost less per watt than rooftop residential installations makes sense, so it might be a win-win case. Michel Well it does provide a ready market

[Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Michel Jullian
, April 18, 2008 1:10 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:23:43 -0700 (PDT): Hi, [snip] Nick, Yes, this low efficiency is undoubtedly true for now. But here is the (possible) paradigm shift, and I should have tried

Re: [Vo]:Re: Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:36:24 +0200: Hi, [snip] Seriously though Jones, have a look at Nanosolar's latest declarations (last few days) and tell me if they still don't make sense to you: http://blog.nanosolar.com/ [snip] Quote: There is a reason why one of the