Re: [Vo]:Re: Interesting stuff in Future Energy eNews

2008-02-25 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:13:43 +0100: Hi, >You guys all missed one tiny detail: in that article they (misleadingly) >specify the width ("1-kilometer-wide" but not the _length_ of the array :) The >hypothetical array would be quite long in fact as it would form

Re: [Vo]:Re: Interesting stuff in Future Energy eNews

2008-02-25 Thread Nick Palmer
> They're planning to build Ringworld?

[Vo]:Re: Interesting stuff in Future Energy eNews

2008-02-25 Thread Michel Jullian
You guys all missed one tiny detail: in that article they (misleadingly) specify the width ("1-kilometer-wide" but not the _length_ of the array :) The hypothetical array would be quite long in fact as it would form a continuous band at geostationary orbit (cf the actual study group report furth