14, 2015 8:39 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field
Strange, I pasted the link, but then the email accidentally sent prematurely
without the link:
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/126986/where-does-the-electron-get-its
hmmm I wonder...
If spin is a spin of the electrons field, then maybe electrons are like
earth moon, and for each revolution around the center, they revolve once so
as to always show the same side to the nucleus.
This way each orbit would produce one revolution. And it would mean spin
only happen
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:51 PM, wrote:
If free electrons had a spin magnetic moment, then I would expect this to
> also
> happen for cyclotron radiation.
>
> If it does, then I'm obviously wrong about electron intrinsic spin.
>
It would be interesting to know about whether there's line splittin
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:02:40 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>Where does the photon get its angular momentum, when it and its twin appear
>from positron-electron enillalation?
Both have opposite spins, so the net is zero.
>
>I am not familiar with what line splitting the cy
ar with what line splitting the cyclotron frequency is.
>>>
>>> Bob Cook
>>>
>>> -Original Message----- From: mix...@bigpond.com
>>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 7:43 PM
>>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic m
equency is.
>>
>> Bob Cook
>>
>> -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com
>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 7:43 PM
>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic
>> field
>>
>>
enillalation?
>
> I am not familiar with what line splitting the cyclotron frequency is.
>
> Bob Cook
>
> -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 7:43 PM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion
: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:29:26 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
IMO free electrons have no magnetic moment, because they have no
"spin",
which
is not an intrinsic
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:29:26 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>IMO free electrons have no magnetic moment, because they have no "spin",
>which
>is not an intrinsic property of the electron, but rather a direct
>consequence of
>being bound to an atom.
>
>Now I would sa
Robin--
You stated:
IMO free electrons have no magnetic moment, because they have no "spin",
which
is not an intrinsic property of the electron, but rather a direct
consequence of
being bound to an atom.
Now I would say that is a departure from conventional thinking.
Can you further exp
10 matches
Mail list logo
