On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Fran,
>
>
>
> I think you may know this but if not – it is clear and beyond doubt that
> Naudin made serious measurement errors in calculating the input current in
> the MAHG experiment, and these have never been corrected, AFAIK.
>
>
>
> As for
Fran,
I think you may know this but if not - it is clear and beyond doubt that
Naudin made serious measurement errors in calculating the input current in
the MAHG experiment, and these have never been corrected, AFAIK.
As for Langmuir and the hydrogen torch, I think there could still be
som
I did some reading on the history of Tungsten over the holiday that led me to
down a path similar to the thread below from 2005, Most of the correlations
Have already been made for me but I also considered the Millsian term he coined
"Fire 2.0". Could the differences between an atomic torch and t
3 matches
Mail list logo
