;s carbon content, enabling CO2
> emission by future volcanoes erupting downstream as shown on the nice page
> you pointed us to.
>
> Michel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Jonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 1
as shown on the nice page you
pointed us to.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "David Jonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission
> Positive or negative? Seems like more tectonic
Positive or negative? Seems like more tectonic movement causes more CO2? On
the other hand biomass might get covered when a plate goes below another. I
suppose this is a necessity for oil production?
Here is a link http://dilu.bol.ucla.edu/ . The relations seems complex.
The PDF of the lecture ye
Makes sense, since plate tectonics obviously have a role in volcanic activity,
which has a role in CO2 emission (cf the nice postings by Stephen and Taylor in
the "Thawing..." thread explaining how the planet may have recovered from
"snowball Earth" conditions thanks to volcanic CO2 emission and
4 matches
Mail list logo