Re: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-22 Thread Axil Axil
Notable derivatives of the Cube-series are the 1-solid-gnomons, D = 1, 7, 19, 37, 61, 91, 127, 169, ... - its terms formed from the differences of adjacent cubes, thus: D(i) = C(i) - C(i-1) = (i)^3 - (i-1)^3 = 3i(i-1) + 1 On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Man on Bridges wrote: > Hi, > > > On

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-22 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 23-5-2011 3:29, Man on Bridges wrote: Hi, On 18-5-2011 20:05, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: I didn't immediately know what made mersenne primes so special so I went over to wiki for a qwik upload: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_primes Nope. Correct sequence is: 7,19,37,

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-22 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 18-5-2011 20:05, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: I didn't immediately know what made mersenne primes so special so I went over to wiki for a qwik upload: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_primes Nope. Correct sequence is: 7,19,37,61,91,127,169,217,271,331,397 Kind regards, M

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-18 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Axil > Ø  These planar clusters have six-fold symmetry and contain 7, 19, 37, 61, > or 91 hydrogen atoms. These numbers are the so called magic numbers for > closed-pack clusters. But 91 isn't prime. Or am I missing something vital here. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com w

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-18 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
I didn't immediately know what made mersenne primes so special so I went over to wiki for a qwik upload: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_primes Pretty simple algorithm. I was nevertheless surprised to discover that the Wiki article on this particular subject appears have multiple issues, i.

RE: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-18 Thread Jones Beene
Hmm . without getting too mystical - 7, 19, 37, 61, and 91 hydrogen atoms.. can you predict the next inferred number, based on six-fold symmetry ? It could be the most important since it relates to the square of six. It looks to me like it would be 127. With a six-fold symmetry every progre

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-18 Thread Axil Axil
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/974281/files/0607193.pdf On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:* Axil Axil > > > > Ø These planar clusters have six-fold symmetry and contain 7, 19, 37, 61, > or 91 hydrogen atoms. These numbers are the so called magic numbers for > closed-pac

Re: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-18 Thread Terry Blanton
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > BTW – I changed the spelling of Rydberg, and ‘magic’ in the Subject Heading Maybe he has one right after all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12 T

RE: [Vo]:Rydberg magic numbers

2011-05-18 Thread Jones Beene
From: Axil Axil * These planar clusters have six-fold symmetry and contain 7, 19, 37, 61, or 91 hydrogen atoms. These numbers are the so called magic numbers for closed-pack clusters. Could you provide a reference for that ? Thanks - Jones BTW - I changed the spelling of R