James Bowery wrote:
> McKubre pointed that out. He suspects it is a concerted effort by several
>> leading members of the opposition.
>>
>
> This is why I refer to her as a "pawn" and wonder what was the point of
> this sacrifice.
>
This will not hurt her. Even if cold fusion triumphs, people w
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> She is arrogant. Pride goes before the fall. I would say this column is a
> gift to us, except that it is very well written. McKubre pointed that out.
> He suspects it is a concerted effort by several leading members of the
> opposition.
>
Jones Beene wrote:
> I am going to write to the head Librarian to request cancelation of all
> subscriptions to Sci-Am except for one or two to archive. I will cc to the
> mag. editors.
>
I think that is going too far!
They are not the only ones attacking cold fusion, after all.
By the way,
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 7:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Scientific American censors discussion of cold fusion,
including statements by its own editors
LENR-CANR news item:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1373
She did close and George end up defending cold fusion!
2012/10/31 Jed Rothwell
> Ouellette closed the discussion section of the article. (At least, she
> closed it to me.)
>
> I was going to tell her I summarized our discussion in the news item.
>
> - Jed
>
>
>
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi.
Ouellette closed the discussion section of the article. (At least, she
closed it to me.)
I was going to tell her I summarized our discussion in the news item.
- Jed
6 matches
Mail list logo