On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Steven V Johnson wrote:
>
>> Nah! All'ya need is a Ford Model "T" crank.
>
> We're in luck, then. We have plenty of cranks in this field.
Yep,
T (Crank)
Steven V Johnson wrote:
Nah! All'ya need is a Ford Model "T" crank.
We're in luck, then. We have plenty of cranks in this field.
- Jed
Terry sez:
...
> I'll bet 'cha there will always be an electric component to the
> initiation of the reaction either way.
Nah! All'ya need is a Ford Model "T" crank.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Second, there is a cat-e design option currently in development that does
> not use any input energy to control the Rossi reaction.
Allegedly. Unless, of course, you have taken a job with Defkalion and
aren't telling us. ;-)
I'll bet 'cha t
There are two counterarguments to the proposition that an electric or
electronic based mechanism contributes to the establishment or the control
of the Rossi effect.
First, for much of the long history of the Cat-e development, a single
heater was used to activate and control the Cold fusion rea
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Terry,
>
> Stray current between two resistance heaters would be counter-intuitive,
> since the heaters are supposed to be well insulated electrically,
Not necessarily. Note that the internal heater could be a nichrome or
tungsten wire in ac
Terry,
Stray current between two resistance heaters would be counter-intuitive,
since the heaters are supposed to be well insulated electrically, and
therefore not thermionic - so we must ask: what kind of current flow is even
possible between two resistance heaters should you desire to maximize t
7 matches
Mail list logo
