Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-23 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:54 AM 6/23/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Well, "Kemo Sabe"'s comments inspired me to create a seminar on Wikiversity to deconstruct, er, examine the skeptical arguments. Lots of people believe the crap he was putting up. http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusio

Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Well, "Kemo Sabe"'s comments inspired me to create a seminar on Wikiversity to deconstruct, er, examine the skeptical arguments. Lots of people believe the crap he was putting up. http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion/Skeptical_arguments I believe you have p

Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-23 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 02:13 PM 6/22/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote: Someone responded in the Shermer article with a number of intemperate remarks, calling the cold fusion researchers a "ragtag band of washed up, senile, incompetent, and/or deceptive losers." When people say that sort of thing they usually lose a debate

Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Steven V Johnson wrote: Your response to "kemo sabe" hasn't posted yet. I presume there is a delay? Probably it has been posted, but you need to go to the next page. That is, click on "11-12." Or reverse the display to "Newest to Oldest." It looks like Abd added a message. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Jed sez: > Someone responded in the Shermer article with a number of intemperate > remarks, calling the cold fusion researchers a "ragtag band of washed up, > senile, incompetent, and/or deceptive losers." When people say that sort of > thing they usually lose a debate by default. > > I posted one

Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Someone responded in the Shermer article with a number of intemperate remarks, calling the cold fusion researchers a "ragtag band of washed up, senile, incompetent, and/or deceptive losers." When people say that sort of thing they usually lose a debate by default. I posted one brief response.

Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 11:33 AM 6/20/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote: See: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=when-scientists-sin "David Goodstein in his new bookOn Fact and Fraud . . . Other cases are not so clear. Martin Fleischmann an

Re: [Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 11:33 AM 6/20/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote: See: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=when-scientists-sin "David Goodstein in his new bookOn Fact and Fraud . . . Other cases are not so clear. Martin Fleischmann an

[Vo]:Shermer quotes Goodstein on cold fusion

2010-06-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=when-scientists-sin "David Goodstein in his new bookOn Fact and Fraud . . . Other cases are not so clear. Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons’s “discovery” of cold fusion, Goodstein concludes, was most likely a case of scientists who “convince