Re: [Vo]:Skeptics Shocked

2012-06-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
Oh, right,a misunderstanding. I'm sorry. But I think if that was true, supposing that show is serious about debunking paranormal, those guys would never have such nonchalant attitude. They would bring all sorts of specialist to analyse the video. It would also be an explosive news in all media. 2

Re: [Vo]:Skeptics Shocked

2012-06-07 Thread Terry Blanton
I am not convinced of anything. AAMOF, I am likely the most difficult to convince having served as a moderator on CompuServe's MUFON forum back in the days before the internet was well known. The people involved were debunkers out to prove that a previous vid was a hoax and it looks like their sh

Re: [Vo]:Skeptics Shocked

2012-06-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
I don't think I should think it is ok to deceive people like that. Well, at least I cannot convince myself in that way. If you can, it's one less stressful thing that you have to deal with, so, good for you. 2012/6/7 Terry Blanton > To each his own, Danny. > > T > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danie

Re: [Vo]:Skeptics Shocked

2012-06-07 Thread Terry Blanton
To each his own, Danny. T

Re: [Vo]:Skeptics Shocked

2012-06-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
I think that is an hoax. Perpetrated by skeptics to later debunk them. Sadly, people will believe in that. Even sadder it is that life is so difficult that many of us clings to fantasies or myths, and the guys who are perpetrating this hoax are aware of that, and will feel proud to frustrate these

[Vo]:Skeptics Shocked

2012-06-07 Thread Terry Blanton
So you go out to prove a UFO video a hoax and wind up messing your pants at what you photograph: http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981381346 T