In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:06:48 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
In practice the bell would need to be supported, on an insulating base. I think
most of the sound energy would actually end up in the base, not in the metal.
The only way to really do your experiment is in orbit, wh
59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sound in a Vacuum
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:36 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Eventually the energy would become heat which I assume appears like incoherent
phonons, but initially it would be generated as waves propagating outwards from
the point at which it is thermalized.
intended) Perhaps you should follow up on that idea and see if it has legs.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Oct 1, 2013 1:53 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Sound in a Vacuum
Dave,
Speaking of theimplications of “sound in a vacuum”, or lack thereof - one
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:36 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Eventually the energy would become heat which I assume appears like
> incoherent phonons, but initially it would be generated as waves
> propagating outwards from the point at which it is thermalized. Here
> outwards should be interpreted a
For your consideration:
http://www.human-resonance.org/tibetan_levitation.html
Dave,
Speaking of the implications of "sound in a vacuum", or lack thereof - one
possibility of interest which may have promise for gain (Maxwell's demon
type of gain) involves the so called "singing bowl" phenomena.
These bowls can produce sustained ringing for extended periods but are of
directions. In
that case the conservation of momentum ensures that a calibrated extra amount
of matter is extracted in the direction of the projectile motion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Oct 1, 2013 12:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sound in a Vacuum
ic Walker
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, Oct 1, 2013 12:07 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sound in a Vacuum
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:54 AM, David Roberson wrote:
>
> The thermal power exiting each square centimeter of surface area is
>> well within reason when 10 mi
, Oct 1, 2013 12:07 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sound in a Vacuum
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:54 AM, David Roberson wrote:
The thermal power exiting each square centimeter of surface area is well within
reason when 10 micrometer material is used and should not cause a meltdown
according to preliminary
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:54 AM, David Roberson wrote:
The thermal power exiting each square centimeter of surface area is well
> within reason when 10 micrometer material is used and should not cause a
> meltdown according to preliminary figures.
>
If the mass energy of the fusion events is deli
or.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Oct 1, 2013 8:39 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Sound in a Vacuum
Interesting thoughts, David.
It made me wonder if strategically induced harmonics fed into the material
could be used to increase the
Interesting thoughts, David.
It made me wonder if strategically induced harmonics fed into the material
could be used to increase the amplitude of generated heat of the target
material. I would assume controlled frequencies within the ultrasonic range
would be used. Could one control or focus wher
I had an interesting thought that I wanted to share with the gang. What would
happen if you ring a bell that is totally engulfed within a vacuum? Since
there is no way for the energy to escape the bell by being radiated through air
one would think that the sound waves contained within the bel
13 matches
Mail list logo
