Re: [Vo]:Speculations on why Rossi and Defkalion don't seem to enhance their credibility - to our satisfaction

OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: Back in 2009? Is that the correct year? Seems awfully early to me, > particularly since Rossi didn't really didn't start making noises till 2011. > Yup. I confirm it says 2009. I heard about Rossi about that time. I did not report it here because there

Re: [Vo]:Speculations on why Rossi and Defkalion don't seem to enhance their credibility - to our satisfaction

I refer also often to Millis slides http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?804-Why-Reactors-demo-and-proofs-are-so-weak http://www.focus.it/fileflash/energia/fusioneFredda/FF_doc/2009-06-25_NAS

[Vo]:Speculations on why Rossi and Defkalion don't seem to enhance their credibility - to our satisfaction

Regarding Rossi, Jed recently posted: > Rossi allowed independent testing of his devices in 2009. I have the > data and photos right here. I have had this data for a long time. > For some reason the people doing these tests and Rossi himself wish > to keep these results confidential. I canno