In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:27:40 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Now, considering the amount of hydrogen required, why not supply a H2
>pressurized cartridge with the powder magic mixture? If you do the
>math, I think you will see that no new hydrogen will be required for
>the
Where does it end? Remember quad audio systems?
"Steve Martin buys a stereo and days later he's not satisfied — the
system sounds like shit. He moves up the audio chain to, finally "the
Googlephonic," the be-all, end-all of audio systems. After a couple
days, that one sounds like shit. Martin con
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Michele Comitini
wrote:
> 2011/4/29 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson :
>> Aren't they manufacturing triple blades now? Where will it stop!
>
> penta blades!
Truth:
http://money.cnn.com/2005/09/14/news/fortune500/gillette/
Fiction:
http://www.theonion.com/art
2011/4/29 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson :
> Aren't they manufacturing triple blades now? Where will it stop!
penta blades!
Terry sez:
> Gillette learned long ago that you can give away the
> razor holder and make money on replacement razors.
Indeed.
Then someone comes along and shatters the status quo with a bold new
paradigm shift in the history of shaving: Double blade cartridges. Ergo:
Twin e-Cats!
Aren't they m
Gillette learned long ago that you can give away the razor holder and
make money on replacement razors.
T
PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Success for Rossi will bringing funding for others
> I'm not convinced that the ECat will require a hydrogen source. He
> once stated that the ECat will run off a "replaceable cartridge" that
> will be replaced every 6 (?) months.
>
> Now, conside
I'm not convinced that the ECat will require a hydrogen source. He
once stated that the ECat will run off a "replaceable cartridge" that
will be replaced every 6 (?) months.
Now, considering the amount of hydrogen required, why not supply a H2
pressurized cartridge with the powder magic mixture?
In reply to Michele Comitini's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:36:12 +:
Hi,
[snip]
>With 1 g of Ni I got 750 kW.
>Again thank you for your attention.
[snip]
Note that at 5 MeV / (Ni62 or Ni64) 1 gm of Ni could sustain 750 kW for about 9
minutes. Probably just long enough to melt the reactor. ;)
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
According to one of my zany new age sources (Meaning the following is a
> totally unscientific analysis) Rossi & Focardi have worked together through
> many past lives associations. As a result of experiencing many past-life
> associations they have forged a c
Michele sez:
> Rossi's previous life, when he was the "taxi driver"?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e9CkhBb18E
>
> ;-)
Oh dear! I can't help it... I just gotta blurt out something blatantly OT here!
According to one of my zany new age sources (Meaning the following is
a totally unscientif
Akira Shirakawa wrote:
> Maybe it's off-topic here, but some more interesting answers have been
> posted on his blog, although they are not very technical this time:
>
> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=4#comment-35562
>
>
> 1. How many e-cats are in continuous operation t
Rossi's previous life, when he was the "taxi driver"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e9CkhBb18E
;-)
2011/4/28 Akira Shirakawa :
> * * *
> AR,
> Some good E-Cat trivia for the fans:
>
> 1. How many e-cats are in continuous operation today?
> 2. How many geographic locations are e-cats running to
On 2011-04-28 20:23, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Thank you Akira!
So it was 37 times, not 32. No wonder I could not find it.
We should add this to the Wiki.
Maybe it's off-topic here, but some more interesting answers have been
posted on his blog, although they are not very technical this time:
ht
Axil Axil wrote:
As in nuclear light water reactor designs, high pressure is inherently
> unsafe.
>
>
>
> Rossi is no paragon of engineering safety and has shown that he has not
> learned any nuclear engineering lessons. The use of a large amount of
> compressed hydrogen storage is inherently uns
2011/4/28 Axil Axil :
> As in nuclear light water reactor designs, high pressure is inherently
> unsafe.
>
>
>
> Rossi is no paragon of engineering safety and has shown that he has not
> learned any nuclear engineering lessons. The use of a large amount of
> compressed hydrogen storage is inherentl
As in nuclear light water reactor designs, high pressure is inherently
unsafe.
Rossi is no paragon of engineering safety and has shown that he has not
learned any nuclear engineering lessons. The use of a large amount of
compressed hydrogen storage is inherently unsafe.
The high pressure hydro
I'd say that nuclear reactor design is an engineering disaster as it
is now. There are too many chances that something bad
happens. Why is it so? In the "2nd generation" they just took
reactors used for nuclear marine propulsion, adapted to electrical
energy
production. That would have been fine
The quality of engineering, operation and management has the primary impact
on the safety and cost of a system.
For example, "The Sporty rear-engined Chevrolet Corvair " (unsafe at any
speed) was a engineering disaster area for the automotive industry.
Today a formula one race car can hit a w
Thank you Akira!
So it was 37 times, not 32. No wonder I could not find it.
We should add this to the Wiki.
I should not trust my memory for numbers. I usually remember them as the
nearest power of 2: 16, 32, 64, 128 . . .
- Jed
On 2011-04-28 20:07, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Did Rossi really admit to this?
Just the other day I thought he said it exploded 32 times, but now I
cannot find the original source. This is annoying! My e-mail search
feature does not work well.
Here:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.co
Jones Beene wrote:
Good points - "keep it understated" but where is the reference to numerous
prior explosions of E-Cat?
Did Rossi really admit to this?
Just the other day I thought he said it exploded 32 times, but now I
cannot find the original source. This is annoying! My e-mail search
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=211
-
Andrea Rossi
July 13th, 2010 at 2:50 PM
Dear Prof. Celani,
I am really pleased from the fact that you looked at our work. I know
who you are and I thank you really for your attention.
Our standard module consumes 500 watts and yields constantl
-Original Message-
From: Michele Comitini
> Well IMHO the cold fusion people should stop the "completely/ absolutely
> safe" claim, that even being true is not believable in people experience.
> They should stay conservatively on "safer" or "safest" level. "absolutely
> safe" triggers
2011/4/28 Jed Rothwell :
> Michele Comitini wrote:
>
>>
>> IMHO there is no need to fear that explosions will stop cold fusion. We
>> have had all kinds of explosions in the history of energy production and/or
>> extraction.
>
> Yes. For example, when Rudolf Diesel developed his engine, one of the
Michele Comitini wrote:
> IMHO there is no need to fear that explosions will stop cold fusion. We
> have had all kinds of explosions in the history of energy production and/or
> extraction.
Yes. For example, when Rudolf Diesel developed his engine, one of them
exploded. However, nowadays peopl
> Vasudev Godbole and others have expressed fears that Rossi's cells may not
> be safe, because they require lead shielding and 32 of them exploded. I
> share these fears. I think it may be premature to begin selling reactors
> around the end of the year.
IMHO there is no need to fear that explosi
I believe that if Rossi succeeds, the floodgates will open and many other
deserving experiments will be funded. I wrote to Mizuno:
"Rossi's results with Ni-H are similar to your results with phenanthrene. I
think that if he succeeds, the mass media and people everywhere will believe
that cold fusi
28 matches
Mail list logo
